Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea

From: Josh Loberant <jamracing(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea
Date: 2014-07-30 19:44:07
Message-ID: 1406749447911-5813345.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Was this issue ever resolved?
We are now having Nagios checks failing due to the pg_size_pretty function,
and the check runs fine on my local machine 9.1 (fails on 9.2 and 9.3, both
having two pg_size_pretty functions).

Thanks,
Josh

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/No-pg-size-pretty-numeric-was-not-such-a-hot-idea-tp5710106p5813345.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2014-07-30 20:18:03 Re: gaussian distribution pgbench -- splits v4
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-07-30 19:42:34 Re: Allow GRANT TRIGGER privilege to DROP TRIGGER (Re: Bug ##7716)