Agent M <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com> writes:
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but using UDP logging on the same
> computer is a red herring. Any non-blocking I/O would do, no? If the
> buffer is full, then the non-blocking I/O send function will fail and
> the message is skipped.
Uh, not entirely. We'd like the thing to drop complete messages, not
inject partial messages into the channel causing reader parsing errors.
This is one reason for liking UDP semantics better than pipe semantics.
regards, tom lane