Re: Priority table or Cache table

From: Sameer Thakur <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Priority table or Cache table
Date: 2014-05-16 10:29:01
Message-ID: 1400236141628-5804200.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,
I applied the patch to current HEAD. There was one failure (attached),
freelist.rej
<http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n5804200/freelist.rej>

Compiled the provided pgbench.c and added following in .conf
shared_buffers = 128MB # min 128kB
Shared_buffers=64MB
Priority_buffers=128MB

I was planning to performance test later hence different values.

But while executing pgbench the following assertion occurs

LOG: database system is ready to accept connections
LOG: autovacuum launcher started
TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(strategy_delta >= 0)", File: "bufmgr.c", Line:
1435)
LOG: background writer process (PID 10274) was terminated by signal 6:
Aborted
LOG: terminating any other active server processes
WARNING: terminating connection because of crash of another server process
DETAIL: The postmaster has commanded this server process to roll back the
current transaction and exit, because another server process exited
abnormally and possibly corrupted shared memory.

Is there a way to avoid it? Am i making some mistake?
regards
Sameer

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Priority-table-or-Cache-table-tp5792831p5804200.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2014-05-16 12:50:43 Re: sepgsql: label regression test failed
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-05-16 10:28:53 btree_gist macaddr valgrind woes