| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO |
| Date: | 2006-08-28 17:57:29 |
| Message-ID: | 13996.1156787849@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera rta:
>> Hum, are you going to put back the original cruft to support copy view?
>> I suggest you don't do that.
> Well, the other way around is to teach heap_open()
> to use views. Brrr. Would it be any cleaner?
Don't even think of going there ;-)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 18:33:22 | autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 17:53:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2006-08-28 19:07:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 17:53:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO |