Re: tracking down a warning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tracking down a warning
Date: 2008-11-19 18:28:55
Message-ID: 13969.1227119335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:54 +0000, Grzegorz Jakiewicz wrote:
>> change loging level to debug1 in postgresql.conf, it will log
>> statements.

> Why not just setting log_statement to all? (or whatever)

I think the least verbose way to find it would be to set
log_min_error_statement to "warning". With either of the above
you'd get lots of useless log traffic about non-problematic statements.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-11-19 19:15:20 Re: Any risks in using FUNCTIONs (stored procedures) instead of raw sql queries?
Previous Message Josh Harrison 2008-11-19 18:23:59 Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 download?