Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
Date: 2002-12-16 16:12:31
Message-ID: 13962.1040055151@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> meaning if ecpg references PGnotify, should it have a new major number
> too,

No, because PGnotify is *not part of ecpg's API*.

The ecpg library, when compiled, will show a dependency on the new major
number for libpq. That does not mean that applications linked to ecpg
need to be recompiled. They don't (unless they depend directly on libpq
too).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-16 16:15:27 Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-16 16:01:00 Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?