Re: Minimum supported version of Python?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Minimum supported version of Python?
Date: 2014-03-27 04:11:28
Message-ID: 1395893488.30049.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 18:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> After further experimentation, I've found that 2.3 does pass the
> regression
> tests if one installs the separately-available cdecimal module. So my
> complaint reduces to the fact that our "Requirements" documentation
> doesn't mention the need for this. Do you have an objection to adding
> something there?

You backpatched this change, but that can't be right, because the
feature that requires the cdecimal module was added in 9.4
(7919398bac8bacd75ec5d763ce8b15ffaaa3e071).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-03-27 04:35:45 Few new warnings have been introduced in windows build (jsonb_util.c)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-03-27 03:23:21 Re: Why MarkBufferDirtyHint doesn't increment shared_blks_dirtied