From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU again |
Date: | 2025-08-06 14:01:03 |
Message-ID: | 1394565.1754488863@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 12:26 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> BTW, I see that you applied ed26c4e25 only to master, but don't
>> we want to back-patch? cpluspluscheck is not just an exercise in a
>> vacuum, it's to ensure that C++-coded extensions don't have trouble
>> with our headers.
> I was thinking that it was run only when developing new features, not
> for backpatch-able bug fixes, but that's a flawed assumption. I'll
> remedy that soon along with the new symbols above, unless you beat me
> to it.
Sounds good, thanks for dealing with it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-08-06 14:12:53 | Re: index prefetching |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-08-06 13:53:41 | Re: Fixed a minor typo in code comment |