Re: reducing isolation tests runtime

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reducing isolation tests runtime
Date: 2018-01-24 23:35:00
Message-ID: 13915.1516836900@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>> On the subject of test total time, we could paralelize isolation tests.

> Oh, cool. Yes, the time the isolation tests take to run is quite
> annoying. I didn't realize it would be so easy to run it in parallel.

+1 to both --- I hadn't realized we had enough infrastructure to do this
in parallel, either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-01-24 23:37:18 Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-01-24 23:30:20 Re: reducing isolation tests runtime

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-01-24 23:37:18 Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-01-24 23:32:40 Re: CONSTANT/NOT NULL/initializer properties for plpgsql record variables