Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance (summary v2 2014-1-17)

From: Миша Тюрин <tmihail(at)bk(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: lsf-pc(at)lists(dot)linux-foundation(dot)org <lsf-pc(at)lists(dot)linux-foundation(dot)org>
Subject: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance (summary v2 2014-1-17)
Date: 2014-01-21 20:01:01
Message-ID: 1390334461.394216828@f228.i.mail.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Hi
But maybe postgres should provide its own subsystem like linux active/inactive memory over and/or near shared buffers? There
could be some postgres special heuristics in its own approach.
And does anyone know how mysql-innodb guys are getting with similar issues?
Thank you!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-01-21 20:09:34 Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-21 20:00:59 Re: inherit support for foreign tables