Re: Missing CFI in hlCover()?

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> We could hard-code a rule like that, or we could introduce a new
>> explicit parameter for the maximum cover length. The latter would be
>> more flexible, but we need something back-patchable and I'm concerned
>> about the compatibility hazards of adding a new parameter in minor
>> releases. So on the whole I propose hard-wiring a multiplier of,
>> say, 10 for both these cases.

> That sounds alright to me, though I do think we should probably still
> toss a CFI (or two) in this path somewhere as we don't know how long
> some of these functions might take...

Yeah, of course. I'm still leaning to doing that in TS_execute_recurse.

regards, tom lane