| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| Date: | 2008-10-07 14:08:47 |
| Message-ID: | 13866.1223388527@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> A patch specifically marked as "required for other work" has been
> delayed by more than 5 weeks on queue and nobody was ever assigned to
> review it. That was exactly the problem CommitFests were supposed to
> resolve and from my perspective this is a systemic failure.
To be blunt, that patch spent most of September in "waiting for author"
state. Looking in the archives, I see that
* Original patch was posted on 31-Aug.
* I reviewed that patch on 8-Sep.
* You posted a revised patch on 10-Sep, but it was explicitly marked
as not ready to be actioned.
* It was not until 23-Sep that a patch was posted that you stated
you were happy with.
* I reviewed that one on 25-Sep.
* The patch now in the queue was posted on 30-Sep (all of 8 minutes
before midnight).
I don't see any systemic failure here.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-07 14:11:53 | Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock |
| Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-10-07 14:05:36 | doubts about toast_flatten_tuple_attribute/heap_form_tuple |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-07 14:27:17 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-07 12:50:38 | Re: Subtransaction commits and Hot Standby |