Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3
Date: 2013-12-08 16:12:56
Message-ID: 1386519176.31519.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In my opinion, the idea of having a separate lint checker for a language
is antiquated. If there are problems, they should be diagnosed at
compile time or run time. You can add options about warning levels or
strictness if there are concerns about which diagnostics are
appropriate.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-08 16:15:36 Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-08 16:00:10 Re: Completing PL support for Event Triggers