| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CLUSTER FREEZE |
| Date: | 2013-12-08 15:51:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1386517869.31519.6.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 18:24 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-11-19 12:23:30 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > >> Yes, we probably should make a decision, unless Robert's idea can be
> > >> implemented. We have to balance the ease of debugging MVCC failures
> > >> with the interface we give to the user community.
> > >
> > > Imo that patch really doesn't need too much further work.
> >
> > Would you care to submit a version you're happy with?
>
> I'll give it a spin sometime this week.
I'm setting the CLUSTER FREEZE patch as returned with feedback, until
this other patch has been considered.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-12-08 16:00:10 | Re: Completing PL support for Event Triggers |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-12-08 15:45:03 | Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation |