Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
Date: 2013-12-05 01:17:47
Message-ID: 1386206267.13848.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:45 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Yeah, that's another thing we could simplify if we fixed this problem
> > at the source. I think these decisions date from a time when we still
> > cared about the speed of fmgr_oldstyle.
>
> Sure, let's whack that thing with a crowbar.

Or just remove it. Who still needs it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-05 01:25:53 Re: Proposal: variant of regclass
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-12-05 01:08:33 Re: Changes in Trigger Firing