| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |
| Date: | 2013-11-30 21:51:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1385848310.7500.307.camel@jdavis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 18:34 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> I merged your patch in, rebased against master, fixed some more typos I
> found, and filled in the gaps you found in the docs. Version 17 of the
> patch is attached to that email, passes `make check`.
A couple more questions:
1. During the initial development of extensions, there was discussion
about ordered version numbers and dependencies on the version (e.g.
requires foo >= 2.1). Outside the scope of this patch, of course, but is
that something that we can still do later? Or are we building
infrastructure that will make that nearly impossible in a release or
two?
2. People will want to start using this feature to control and version
their schema. Do you have comments about that? Should we eventually try
to get extensions to support that use case (if they don't already), or
should that be a completely different feature?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-11-30 21:53:38 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2013-11-30 21:39:04 | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |