| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new unicode table border styles for psql |
| Date: | 2013-11-29 02:10:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1385691009.14059.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 16:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
> wrote:
> > Now for the linestyles. I can see how some of them are attractive,
> but
> > several of them have poor aesthetics, I think. I don't see a reason
> to
> > accept 7 new styles just for fun. If I had to choose, I'd consider
> > -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.
>
> I'm confused why we need ANY of these.
I'm not actually in favor of adding any of these. I was just trying to
say that any but the ones I mentioned I don't consider acceptable at
all.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-11-29 02:12:28 | Re: new unicode table border styles for psql |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2013-11-29 02:04:10 | Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away |