Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Date: 2013-11-22 21:55:10
Message-ID: 1385157310.96336.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:

This covers pg_dumpall globals.  Tested with a read-only postgres
database and with default_transaction_read_only = on in the
postgresql.conf file.

It does nothing about pg_upgrade, which is sort of a separate
issue.  My inclination is that connections to the new cluster
should set this and connections to the old should not.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_dump-vs-default_transaction_read_only-v2.diff text/x-diff 1.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-11-22 21:58:24 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-22 21:52:53 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-11-22 21:58:24 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-22 21:52:53 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency