Re: Should database = all in pg_hba.conf match a replication connection?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should database = all in pg_hba.conf match a replication connection?
Date: 2010-04-21 03:33:19
Message-ID: 13850.1271820799@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Apr 20, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Should we change this? It seems to me to be a good thing on security
>>> grounds if replication connections can't be made through a generic
>>> pg_hba entry.
>>
>> +1.

> +1 too.

Done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-04-21 03:46:06 Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2010-04-21 03:09:43 Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance