Re: new heapcheck contrib module

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Date: 2020-09-23 01:17:58
Message-ID: 1384260.1600823878@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:09 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> +REVOKE ALL ON FUNCTION
>> +verify_heapam(regclass, boolean, boolean, cstring, bigint, bigint)
>> +FROM PUBLIC;
>>
>> This too.

> Do we really want to use a cstring as an enum-like argument?

Ugh. We should not be using cstring as a SQL-exposed datatype
unless there really is no alternative. Why wasn't this argument
declared "text"?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-23 01:41:10 Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-23 01:14:28 Re: Lift line-length limit for pg_service.conf