From: | Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: table lock when where clause uses unique constraing instead of primary key. |
Date: | 2013-11-04 20:44:07 |
Message-ID: | 1383597847.53321.YahooMailNeo@web161402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Monday, November 4, 2013 2:25 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I grepped the schema (just to be sure) - no foreign keys on columns or table at all.
> I do have an audit trigger on the table for updates - inserts into an audit table when changes are made and it DOES do a separate select from user_profile for other reasons - but not "for update" or anything - no explicit locking.
>
>Would it be possible to see that audit function?
it's kind of long (really just a lot of compares of old/new values.
The relevant portion (that selects from user_profile) looks like this:
BEGIN
SELECT user_id, user_ip INTO my_user_id, my_user_ip FROM audit_metadata WHERE pg_pid = getpid();
IF ((NOT FOUND) OR (my_user_id = -1)) THEN
SELECT user_id INTO my_user_id FROM user_profile WHERE username = 'db-'||CURRENT_USER and user_type='DBASE';
IF (NOT FOUND) THEN
RAISE EXCEPTION 'USERNAME NOT FOUND IN USER_PROFILE: % ',CURRENT_USER;
END IF;
my_user_ip := inet_client_addr();
END IF;
INSERT INTO audit .....
END;
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2013-11-04 20:56:45 | Re: table lock when where clause uses unique constraing instead of primary key. |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2013-11-04 20:25:48 | Re: table lock when where clause uses unique constraing instead of primary key. |