Recent "could not register background process" buildfarm failures

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Recent "could not register background process" buildfarm failures
Date: 2026-08-18 15:39:14
Message-ID: 1383452.1787067554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In the past three weeks, two different buildfarm animals have
reported failures like this in test_shm_mq [1][2][3]:

# SELECT test_shm_mq(1024, 'a', 2001, 1);
# - test_shm_mq
# --------------
# -
# -(1 row)
# -
# +ERROR: could not register background process
# +HINT: You may need to increase "max_worker_processes".

test_shm_mq itself hasn't changed meaningfully in ages,
so it seems like some recent change somewhere else has increased
the probability of not being able to get a worker process.
Maybe autovacuum is eating too many workers? Any thoughts?

regards, tom lane

[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tayra&dt=2026-07-25%2005%3A43%3A54
[2] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=akepa&dt=2026-08-17%2021%3A37%3A41
[3] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=akepa&dt=2026-08-18%2013%3A52%3A05

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2026-08-18 15:46:09 Fix GRAPH TABLE label and property error reporting
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2026-08-18 15:18:41 Re: MPTCP - multiplexing many TCP connections through one socket to get better bandwidth