Re: Big trouble with libpq++

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "J(dot) T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)cistron-office(dot)nl>
Cc: Stéphane EVEILLARD <steff33(at)ifrance(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Big trouble with libpq++
Date: 2001-03-15 15:50:12
Message-ID: 13832.984671412@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

"J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv(at)cistron-office(dot)nl> writes:
> You should be able to solve this either by linking dynamically, or if you
> want to stick with the static version, to link with libpq as well as libpq++.

Yes, for a static link you should say
-lpq++ -lpq
not only -lpq++. Actually, I'd tend to do that for a dynamic link
too... can't hurt.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Welche 2001-03-16 19:51:24 Access datetime oddities
Previous Message Karel Zak 2001-03-15 15:38:48 Re: to_date problem