From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
Date: | 2011-11-03 21:28:34 |
Message-ID: | 13830.1320355714@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thursday, November 03, 2011 1:03:12 pm hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>> as you can see counts of rows in created table are more or less
>> sensible, but whatever method I used - create table as, insert into,
>> using sychronized_scans (initially) or not (later) - copy of the table,
>> as long as it's in database, has 40 those "-1" rows.
> At least it is consistent:)
Yeah, it wasn't clear before, but it looks like there are specific
rows that there's something wrong with.
> Characteristics of those forty rows.
> 1) creation_tsz clustered?
> 2) magic_id in a range?
> 3) Non -1 xobject_id in a range?
> 4) Any other field show a similarity?
I would like to know the ctid's of the -1 rows in the copied table,
along with the ctid's of the rows they share magic_ids with, and
the ctid's of the rows with those same magic_ids in the original.
I'm wondering whether the affected rows are physically clustered ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-11-03 21:31:33 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
Previous Message | Cin123 | 2011-11-03 21:01:47 | Linker error VS2008 c++ |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-11-03 21:31:33 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
Previous Message | Rodrigo Hjort | 2011-11-03 21:11:35 | Strange behavior on to_tsquery() |