Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE
Date: 2013-09-15 14:52:23
Message-ID: 1379256743.22934.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

> There is no reason to call CheckForSerializableConflictIn() with
> the additional locks held either. After all, "For a heap insert,
> we only need to check for table-level SSI locks".

You're only talking about not covering that call with a *new*
LWLock, right?  We put some effort into making sure that such calls
were only inside of LWLocks which were needed for correctness.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2013-09-15 15:03:10 Re: Where to load modules from?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-09-15 14:51:01 Re: Where to load modules from?