Re: Re: Commit finished?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Commit finished?
Date: 2000-11-15 17:57:27
Message-ID: 13764.974311047@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> distclean does not remove gram.c because we include gram.c in the
>> distribution. Perhaps there should be another target that gets rid
>> of *all* the derived files (maintainer-clean might be the GNU-approved
>> name for that, not sure). Peter, any comment here?

> Not only that, but we've had it for several months... :-)

Ah, my mistake. I looked in backend/parser/Makefile and didn't see
any rule for maintainer-clean, so assumed it wasn't there yet :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Lang 2000-11-15 18:05:40 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-15 17:54:34 Re: Re: UUNET socket-file-location patch