| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes) |
| Date: | 2013-07-08 17:28:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1373304505.30779.5.camel@jdavis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 22:43 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 10:30 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks fine, but I have one question here.
> >
> > When I run pg_filedump with -k against a database cluster which
> > does not support checksums, pg_filedump produced checksum error as
> > following. Is this expected or acceptable?
>
> Thank you for taking a look. That is expected, because there is not a
> good way to determine whether the file was created with checksums or
> not. So, we rely on the user to supply (or not) the -k flag.
I see this patch is still "waiting on author" in the CF. Is there
something else needed from me, or should we move this to "ready for
committer"?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-07-08 17:32:26 | Re: Improving avg performance for numeric |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-08 17:17:56 | Re: Improving avg performance for numeric |