Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
Date: 2013-07-01 16:34:46
Message-ID: 1372696486.19747.36.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 16:09 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It was originally generated. Since then it's been maintained by hand.

What is the procedure for maintaining it by hand? Why are
HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS and HAVE_SYNC_FILE_RANGE in there (though commented
out), but not HAVE_POSIX_FADVISE?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-07-01 16:42:10 Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)
Previous Message David Fetter 2013-07-01 16:32:17 Re: Randomisation for ensuring nlogn complexity in quicksort