| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Fixes to index pages |
| Date: | 2001-02-22 04:12:47 |
| Message-ID: | 13726.982815167@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> The original version of the patch commandeered an extra bit for tuple
>> length. If you back off INDEX_SIZE_MASK to 1FFF, and document bit
>> 13 as unused/reserved, then it's just a cleanup.
> OK, we are both catching up now on the email. Should I put it in
> current? Seems like cosmetic cleanup. Of course, even if you say yes,
> I have to wait 24 hours.
In the revised form I have no problem with it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chad David | 2001-02-22 18:25:41 | [PATCHES] BlobInputStream.java patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-22 03:57:50 | Re: Re: Fixes to index pages |