Re: Re: Fixes to index pages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages
Date: 2001-02-22 04:12:47
Message-ID: 13726.982815167@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> The original version of the patch commandeered an extra bit for tuple
>> length. If you back off INDEX_SIZE_MASK to 1FFF, and document bit
>> 13 as unused/reserved, then it's just a cleanup.

> OK, we are both catching up now on the email. Should I put it in
> current? Seems like cosmetic cleanup. Of course, even if you say yes,
> I have to wait 24 hours.

In the revised form I have no problem with it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chad David 2001-02-22 18:25:41 [PATCHES] BlobInputStream.java patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-22 03:57:50 Re: Re: Fixes to index pages