| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum, Freeze and Analyze: the big picture |
| Date: | 2013-06-12 23:31:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1371079876.48038.YahooMailNeo@web162906.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Are there other anecdotes about what settings work well in
> practise, assuming people ever find ones that work well?
Putting WAL on its own RAID on its own battery-backed cached can
help a lot more than I would have thought -- even with read-only
transactions.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4B71358E020000250002F0E4@gw.wicourts.gov
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-06-13 00:11:20 | Re: [9.3] Automatically updatable views vs writable foreign tables |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2013-06-12 22:59:25 | Re: [9.3] Automatically updatable views vs writable foreign tables |