Re: [HACKERS] non-functional update notice unneccesarily

There are times when the message is appropriate, I believe. But this
is not one of them. Are all instances of this message gone, or just
this one?

On Mon, 15 June 1998, at 22:51:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > update mempayment set paywho = 'icvproxy' from do_addpayment where dappays
> > eq = payseqid;
> > NOTICE: Non-functional update, only first update is performed
> > UPDATE 31
> >
> > more than one update was indeed performed..
> > I beleive this has happened to me before..
> >
> >
>
> Vadim has said to remove the message, and I have done so. The
> surrounding code in heapam.c is unchanged, just the elog(NOTICE) is
> commented out.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
> + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
>