Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state

From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould)
Cc: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian), vadim(at)krs(dot)ru, vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Date: 1998-06-14 03:07:35
Message-ID: 13699.15991.447162.924830@web0.speakeasy.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I've been trying to use them in my patches as well, maily for
consistency as its something I'd never do myself. I'll gladly
stop though.

On Sat, 13 June 1998, at 19:59:12, David Gould wrote:

> Ok, I won't add them. I'm not taking them out if I see them though ;-).
>
> > Sure, but braces don't help you either. This is just as legal:
> >
> > if (condition);
> > {
> > dosomething();
> > }
>
> True enough, but I think less likely to happen.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-06-14 06:35:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Previous Message David Gould 1998-06-14 02:59:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state