From: | Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | David Gould <dg(at)illustra(dot)com>, Hal Snyder <hal(at)enteract(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections |
Date: | 1998-06-03 23:53:25 |
Message-ID: | 13685.57845.100955.749805@web0.speakeasy.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 3 June 1998, at 18:40:10, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > > select * from procs;
<stuff deleted>
> >
> > "procs" is a pseudo-table that is generated on the fly from the process
> > data structures in the shared memory when queried. There are also
> > pseudo-tables for locks and traces and other information.
That's exactly what I envision. PRobably not what I articulated.
> > The advantage of using SQL is that the data can be selected into other
> > tables, grouped, projected, joined or whatever. The other advantage is
> > that all the exiting clients can take advantage of the data. So if you
> > wanted to write a graphical status monitor, you could do so quite simply
> > in pgtcl.
Exactly.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Gould | 1998-06-04 02:45:24 | Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS |
Previous Message | Brett McCormick | 1998-06-03 23:50:28 | Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections |