From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches |
Date: | 2008-09-26 00:12:26 |
Message-ID: | 1368.1222387946@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Here is how I think SQL-level row permissions would work:
> We already have an optional OID system column that can be specified
> during table creation (WITH OIDS). We could have another optional oid
> column (WITH ROW SECURITY) called security_context which would store the
> oid of the role that can see the row; if the oid is zero (InvalidOid),
> anyone can see it. SE-PostgreSQL would default to WITH ROW SECURITY and
> use the oid to look up strings in pg_security.
This is just a different syntax for KaiGai's label storage
implementation. It doesn't really answer any of the hard questions,
like what the heck is the behavior of foreign keys.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2008-09-26 00:28:43 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-25 22:28:39 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |