Re: sp-gist porting to postgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: "Ramy M(dot) Hassan" <rhassan(at)cs(dot)purdue(dot)edu>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Walid G(dot) Aref" <aref(at)cs(dot)purdue(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: sp-gist porting to postgreSQL
Date: 2004-11-10 17:15:02
Message-ID: 13674.1100106902@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> AFAIK, posgresql doesnt' supports several indices for the same type.

I think what's really being asked for is several operator classes for
the same type. This most certainly *is* possible.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2004-11-10 17:56:58 Re: CREATE or REPLACE function pg_catalog.*
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-10 17:13:25 Re: A modest proposal: get rid of GUC's USERLIMIT variable category