Re: pg_ctl non-idempotent behavior change

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl non-idempotent behavior change
Date: 2013-04-30 02:01:30
Message-ID: 1367287290.32604.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 14:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, this is not tolerable. We could think about improving the logic
> to have a stronger check on whether the old server is really there or
> not (ie it should be doing something more like pg_ping and less like
> just checking if the pidfile is there). But given how close we are to
> beta, maybe the best thing is to revert that change for now and put it
> back on the to-think-about-for-9.4 list. Peter?

Reverted.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-04-30 02:02:13 pgsql: Revert "pg_ctl: Add idempotent option"
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-04-30 01:44:11 Re: Remaining beta blockers