Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I am unsure if I should backpatch to 8.1: the code in cluster.c has
> changed, and while it is relatively easy to modify the patch, this is a
> rare bug and nobody has reported it in CLUSTER (not many people clusters
> temp tables, it seems). Should I patch only REINDEX? How far back?
I'd say go as far back as you can conveniently modify the patch for.
This is a potential data-loss bug (even if only for temporary data)
so we ought to take it seriously.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-09-11 01:04:45|
|Subject: "txn" in pg_stat_activity|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-09-10 22:44:45|
|Subject: Re: A Silly Idea for Vertically-Oriented Databases|
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-09-11 01:54:05|
|Subject: Re: Close open transactions soon to avoid wraparound problems |
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-09-10 22:07:00|
|Subject: Re: reindexdb hangs|