| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Next 1.16 point release? |
| Date: | 2013-04-18 20:35:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1366317337.3105.14.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 22:15 +0300, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 10:43 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > Hopefully for next PostgreSQL minor releases.
>
> Why? I think we missed at least PostgreSQL 2 releases so far, and some
> bugs makes 1.16 series unusable for 9.2. Why do we need to wait for the
> next PostgreSQL release? I would vote for a release nowadays.
>
Well, I'm not against. We usually only do releases when PostgreSQL does
one.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dhiraj Chawla | 2013-04-19 12:47:44 | Re: Re: Missing REVOKE in SQL for functions with SECURITY DEFINER (or any function, really) |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2013-04-17 09:50:23 | Re: Patch: Auto-generate search_path statement for selected schema in query editor |