Re: To what extent should tests rely on VACUUM ANALYZE?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: To what extent should tests rely on VACUUM ANALYZE?
Date: 2024-03-29 18:35:42
Message-ID: 136505.1711737342@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I experimented with the attached modified version of the patch,
> which probes just after the relevant VACUUMs and reduces the
> crankiness of ConditionalLockBufferForCleanup a bit to more nearly
> approximate what we're likely to see in the buildfarm.

Sigh, forgot to attach the patch, not that you couldn't have
guessed what's in it.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-cranky-ConditionalLockBufferForCleanup.patch text/x-diff 5.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message walther 2024-03-29 18:47:54 Re: Building with meson on NixOS/nixpkgs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-03-29 18:31:32 Re: To what extent should tests rely on VACUUM ANALYZE?