| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq object hooks (libpq events) |
| Date: | 2008-05-20 02:37:58 |
| Message-ID: | 13642.1211251078@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> writes:
> 4. add a setter for result instance data
> - There should also be a PQsetInstanceData(PGconn*, ...)
> - I see no need for a passThrough setter
Check, though I assume we're not expecting PQsetInstanceData to
propagate to previously created PGresults?
> 5. move callback stuff to its own header, maybe pgcallback.h?
Should be libpq-something. I was considering libpq-hooks.h or
libpq-events.h, but libpq-callback.h would be OK too.
> Adding PQresultSetInstanceData doesn't removes the need for a resultcreate
> callback event.
No, of course not. What I was imagining was that the resultcreate
callback would call PQresultSetInstanceData.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-05-20 02:53:23 | Re: libpq object hooks (libpq events) |
| Previous Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-05-20 02:21:07 | Re: libpq object hooks (libpq events) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-05-20 02:53:23 | Re: libpq object hooks (libpq events) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-20 02:29:04 | Re: Simplify formatting.c |