Re: Drop type "smgr"?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shawn Debnath <sdn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Drop type "smgr"?
Date: 2019-02-28 22:20:23
Message-ID: 1362.1551392423@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> FWIW, I think while distasteful, I could see us actually using oids,
> just ones that are small enough to fit into 16bit...

If we suppose that all smgrs must be built-in, that's not even much
of a restriction...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2019-02-28 22:23:15 Re: Index Skip Scan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-02-28 22:17:43 Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation