Re: meson oddities

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: meson oddities
Date: 2022-11-16 16:54:10
Message-ID: 1360237.1668617650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2022-11-16 10:53:59 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Could you explain this in more detail?

> If I just want to install postgres into a prefix without 'postgresql' added in
> a bunch of directories, e.g. because I already have pg-$version to be in the
> prefix, there's really no good way to do so - you can't even specify
> --sysconfdir or such, because we just override that path.

At least for the libraries, the point of the 'postgresql' subdir IMO
is to keep backend-loadable extensions separate from random libraries.
It's not great that we may fail to do that depending on what the
initial part of the library path is.

I could get behind allowing the user to specify that path explicitly
and then not modifying it; but when we're left to our own devices
I think we should preserve that separation.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-11-16 17:07:47 Re: meson oddities
Previous Message Thom Brown 2022-11-16 16:44:58 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions