Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes
Date: 2002-04-13 06:05:54
Message-ID: 13591.1018677954@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> case 1: "immutable"
>> case 2: "mutable", or perhaps "stable"
>> case 3: "volatile"

> Since they've changed anyway, how about dropping the silly "is" in front
> of the names?

"volatile" would conflict with a C keyword. Possibly we could get away
with this at the SQL level, but I was worried...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-04-13 06:08:08 Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-13 01:14:11 Re: SI buffer overflow, cache state reset

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-04-13 06:08:08 Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-13 03:39:01 Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip