Re: recovery.conf parsing problems

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: recovery.conf parsing problems
Date: 2006-12-14 00:34:42
Message-ID: 13584.1166056482@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:
> That only helps if you can trust %p not to contain whitespace or $. If it
> is always relative to somewhere in the data dir then this is probably ok,
> but if it's an absolute path then you can't assume that.

It is relative, so I think this is actually not a problem. Still, we
ought to make the lexical structure the same as it is in postgresql.conf.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2006-12-14 00:36:57 Re: pg_standby and build farm
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-14 00:28:20 Re: Operator class group proposal