Re: Bug in PgAdmin 1.16.1

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in PgAdmin 1.16.1
Date: 2013-01-13 18:45:12
Message-ID: 1358102712.3252.37.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 01:49 -0200, Edson Richter wrote:
> Don't know if pgAdmin maintainer keep an eye in this list, but here I go:
>
> - Using pgAdmin 1.16.1 in Windows 7 x64 downloaded today
>
> 1) You alter a role, adding any information you want: when the
> properties page is open, pgAdmin automatically defines a expiration date
> on 1969/12/31.
>

Yeah, this is a bug we need to fix.

> 2) You want to remove "superuser" option from a role: when you uncheck
> "superuser" box, pgAdmin alerts that removing the superuser from a role
> could cause unexpected behavior, and as you to confirm the action. Once
> you confirm, the "superuser" option is marked again, and nothing else
> happens.
>

This was fixed the 24th of december.

FYI, you should better send this kind of mails to the pgadmin-support
list (http://www.postgresql.org/list/pgadmin-support/).

--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vibhor Kumar 2013-01-13 19:17:34 Re: pg_upgrade failed for 9.0 to 9.2
Previous Message AI Rumman 2013-01-13 18:36:11 pg_upgrade failed for 9.0 to 9.2