Re: [HACKERS] suspected problem with cache updates

From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
Cc: darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com (Darren King), pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] suspected problem with cache updates
Date: 1998-03-13 23:33:30
Message-ID: 13577.49670.45141.381963@abraxas.scene.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


It certainly didn't happen very consistently, in fact, only once.

On Fri, 13 March 1998, at 19:43:48, Jan Wieck wrote:

> But this problem looks different. This time the pg_class
> tuple for a user table is updated where that table had to be
> flushed from the relcache and reopened. Cannot reproduce the
> error here. If I alter table add field, they show up
> immediately in the same session.
>
> >
> > Bruce, do you have old versions of the TODO lists around to check on
> > this one? I specifically remember the part about adding an attribute
> > and it not being there until the next session.
> >
> > darrenk
> >
> >
>
>
> Jan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett McCormick 1998-03-13 23:41:29 Re: [HACKERS] casting & type comments
Previous Message Brett McCormick 1998-03-13 23:31:12 Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql v6.3 for Alpha Digital Unix