Re: Doc patch, further describe and-mask nature of the permission system

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doc patch, further describe and-mask nature of the permission system
Date: 2012-12-16 06:56:22
Message-ID: 1355640982.4311.12.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 20:48 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 02:35:54 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On 11/13/2012 08:50:55 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 01:16 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > > > This patch makes some sweeping statements.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, they are wrong.
> >
> > I will see if anything can be salvaged.
>
> Here's another try.
> (I bundled changes to both paragraphs into a single
> patch.)
>
> grants-of-roles-are-additive_v3.patch

I don't get the point of this change, especially why you are trying to
liken the roles system to the object hierarchy, when they are clearly
different and unrelated.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2012-12-16 07:53:56 Re: Set visibility map bit after HOT prune
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-12-16 06:51:06 Re: Add big fat caution to pg_restore docs regards partial db restores