Re: Doc patch to note which system catalogs have oids

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Doc patch to note which system catalogs have oids
Date: 2012-12-15 05:46:43
Message-ID: 1355550403.7997.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 00:04 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 10:46 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > I am now submitting patches to the commitfest
> > for review. (I'm not sure how I missed this.)
>
> I prefer this version of the patch. I also attached an alternative
> version that may address Tom's concern by noting that the OIDs are
> hidden in the description.

Committed this version.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-12-15 06:23:38 is allow_nonpic_in_shlib still useful?
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-12-15 00:36:19 Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication