| From: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Doc patch, put pg_temp into the documentation's index |
| Date: | 2012-11-18 01:53:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1353203581.30807.1@mofo |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/17/2012 05:10:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 11:33 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> >
what's
> > indexed is the token pg_temp, used when
> > setting search_path.
> Actually, since this is the pg_temp alias for the search path, it is
> appropriate. So committed as is.
Thanks for the work on this and the other patches you've helped
me out with, and for the larger work on PG of course.
I would feel like I was cluttering the channel if I
sent a thanks each time but I do want to acknowledge
both your help and the work the other Postgres people
do.
Regards,
Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2012-11-18 02:07:01 | Re: Do we need so many hint bits? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-11-18 00:35:34 | Re: Do we need so many hint bits? |